Evidence-Based Screening to Optimize the Yield of Positive Ophthalmologic Examinations in Children Evaluated for Suspected Child Abuse.

PURPOSE: To determine nonocular findings associated with significant retinal hemorrhage on dilated fundus examination in cases of suspected child abuse. METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review from May 2014 to August 2021 at a level-1 trauma center. Two hundred seventy-four patients met the following inclusion criteria: (1) children 36 months and younger; (2) concern for child abuse; and (3) had an ophthalmology consultation. Through univariate and multivariate logistic regression, the study produced a screening algorithm for ophthalmic work-up in child abuse. RESULTS: One or more abnormal neuroimaging findings had a statistically significant association with retinal hemorrhages and produced the strongest association with a univariate odds ratio of 170 (confidence interval: 10.245 to > 999.999). The multivariate model (P < .0001 with a c-statistic of 0.980) proposes using the following variables for predicting retinal hemorrhage on examination: abnormal neuroimaging, Glasgow Coma Scale score less than 15, altered mental status on examination, seizure activity, vomiting, bruising, scalp hematoma/swelling, and skull fractures. CONCLUSIONS: This study elucidates clinical and imaging factors that correlate to retinal findings, validating previously studied variables and introducing new variables to be considered. The authors propose an evidence-based screening algorithm to increase the yield of positive dilated examinations and decrease the burden of potentially unnecessary child abuse ophthalmologic examinations. [J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2022;59(5):310-319.].

Coronavirus Disease 2019: Anesthesia Machine Circuit Pressure During Use as an Improvised Intensive Care Unit Ventilator.

BACKGROUND: Use of anesthesia machines as improvised intensive care unit (ICU) ventilators may occur in locations where waste anesthesia gas suction (WAGS) is unavailable. Anecdotal reports suggest as much as 18 cm H2O positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) being inadvertently applied under these circumstances, accompanied by inaccurate pressure readings by the anesthesia machine. We hypothesized that resistance within closed anesthesia gas scavenging systems (AGSS) disconnected from WAGS may inadvertently increase circuit pressures. METHODS: An anesthesia machine was connected to an anesthesia breathing circuit, a reference manometer, and a standard bag reservoir to simulate a lung. Ventilation was initiated as follows: volume control, tidal volume (TV) 500 mL, respiratory rate 12, ratio of inspiration to expiration times (I:E) 1:1.9, fraction of inspired oxygen (Fio2) 1.0, fresh gas flow (FGF) rate 2.0 liters per minute (LPM), and PEEP 0 cm H2O. After engaging the ventilator, PEEP and peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) were measured by the reference manometer and the anesthesia machine display simultaneously. The process was repeated using prescribed PEEP levels of 5, 10, 15, and 20 cm H2O. Measurements were repeated with the WAGS disconnected and then were performed again at FGF of 4, 6, 8, 10, and 15 LPM. This process was completed on 3 anesthesia machines: Dräger Perseus A500, Dräger Apollo, and the GE Avance CS2. Simple linear regression was used to assess differences. RESULTS: Utilizing nonparametric Bland-Altman analysis, the reference and machine manometer measurements of PIP demonstrated median differences of -0.40 cm H2O (95% limits of agreement [LOA], -1.00 to 0.55) for the Dräger Apollo, -0.40 cm H2O (95% LOA, -1.10 to 0.41) for the Dräger Perseus, and 1.70 cm H2O (95% LOA, 0.80-3.00) for the GE Avance CS2. At FGF 2 LPM and PEEP 0 cm H2O with the WAGS disconnected, the Dräger Apollo had a difference in PEEP of 0.02 cm H2O (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.04 to 0.08; P = .53); the Dräger Perseus A500, <0.0001 cm H2O (95% CI, -0.11 to 0.11; P = 1.00); and the GE Avance CS2, 8.62 cm H2O (95% CI, 8.55-8.69; P < .0001). After removing the hose connected to the AGSS and the visual indicator bag on the GE Avance CS2, the PEEP difference was 0.12 cm H2O (95% CI, 0.059-0.181; P = .0002). CONCLUSIONS: Displayed airway pressure measurements are clinically accurate in the setting of disconnected WAGS. The Dräger Perseus A500 and Apollo with open scavenging systems do not deliver inadvertent continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) with WAGS disconnected, but the GE Avance CS2 with a closed AGSS does. This increase in airway pressure can be mitigated by the manufacturer's recommended alterations. Anesthesiologists should be aware of the potential clinically important increases in pressure that may be inadvertently delivered on some anesthesia machines, should the WAGS not be properly connected.

SARS-CoV-2 testing and clinical outcomes in a Texas tertiary care center labor and delivery unit.

Our hospital adopted universal severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) testing for labor and delivery patients in April 2020. The primary aim of this study was to determine the number of subjects from April 1, 2020, to July 31, 2020, who had laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, and the secondary aims were to report demographic and clinical data for subjects with and without SARS-CoV-2 infection and the time from SARS-CoV-2 test collection to result for tests administered in the hospital. A total of 898 subjects had either vaginal or cesarean deliveries with a gestational age of >20 weeks during the study period. Of this group, 746 subjects underwent SARS-CoV-2 testing, and 16 had a positive test result. Four of the 16 subjects with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection had documented symptoms at the time of admission. The difference in cohort size was too large to make a meaningful statistical comparison in demographic and clinical data between those with positive vs negative SARS-CoV-2 test results. The median time from SARS-CoV-2 test collection to result decreased from 239 minutes in April 2020 to 119 minutes in July 2020. Universal SARS-CoV-2 testing revealed a 2.1% positivity rate during our study period.